Question: 1 / 50

A customer does not want an escape hatch on a residential elevator, under what condition is this legal?

Fire-resistant materials are used

Manual operation must be provided

The correct answer highlights the importance of ensuring safety measures in residential elevators. If a customer opts not to install an escape hatch, it is often legal for the elevator to operate without one provided that manual operation is offered. This requirement is rooted in safety protocols, as having a means for users to control the elevator manually enhances the overall safety of the system. It ensures that in situations where an emergency may arise, individuals can still operate the elevator and safely exit. The other conditions mentioned do not independently justify the absence of an escape hatch. For instance, while fire-resistant materials contribute to fire safety, they do not replace the necessity for an escape hatch if deemed required by code. Similarly, regulations concerning the height of the elevator or its travel distance—whether it is above the first floor or below a specific height—are not sole determinants for eliminating an escape hatch. The underlying premise remains that adequate manual operation can effectively provide a safe alternative, ensuring that users can navigate emergencies without relying solely on the elevator's automated systems.

The elevator is not above the first floor

The elevator travels below 12 feet

Next

Report this question